Office 24430741 (Centrex 100), Main Gate 24432017 (Centrex 700), Drivers Waiting Room 24431922 ( Centrex -800)

Monday, June 18, 2012


Minutes of Proceedings of 16th Annual General
Meeting held on 10.06.2012

                                                   Corrigendum

Minutes of Proceedings of the 16th Annual General Meeting held on 10.06.2012 and signed on 12.06.2012 have since been circulated to the members.

It has been noticed that there are a few typographical errors which have occurred due to inadvertence and those have been corrected and should now be read as follows alongwith the Minutes of Proceedings earlier circulated:

Page 03, last paragraph, line 5                   the word ‘through’ should
                                                                        be read as ‘though’

Page 11, 2nd paragraph, line 4                  the figure “2011” should
                                                                       be read as “2012”

Inconvenience caused is sincerely regretted.



(Biswatosh Sarkar)                                                             (Benudhar Munshi)
Secretary                                                                                   Chairman                                                                              
13.06.2012                                                                                13.06.2012






Minutes of Proceedings of 16th Annual General
Meeting held on 10.06.2012

In terms of the Notice dated 18.05.2012 issued by Sri Biswatosh Sarkar, Secretary, Happy Nook Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., the Annual General Meeting of the Society commenced at 5.15 P.M on 10.06.2012 at the Society premises with Sri Benudhar Munshi as Chairman of the meeting.

Members Present:    69 ( Sixty Nine)

The Chairman called the Meeting to order.

At the outset, the Chairman requested the members to observe one minute silence to show respect to the departed souls of late Sujit Sen (A-6 / 5), late Satyajit Roy (A-10 / 15),  late Amal Kumar Bhattacherjee (A- 5 / 7) , late Monjushree Som (A-7 / 6), late Tarun Sarkar (A- 8 / 12), late Adinath Sen (A- 3 / 4), late Juthika Ghosh (A- 6 / 6), late Supriti Purokayastha ( A- 7 / 8), late Gita Gupta (A- 10 / 16) and late Joya Banerjee ( A- 3 / 9) when the members stood in silence.

The Chairman then requested the Secretary to read out the Notice dated 18th May, 2012 of the 16th Annual General Meeting for convening the meeting which was done.

Being requested by the Chairman, the Secretary initiated discussion Agenda wise.

Agenda No: 01
Confirmation of the Proceedings of the Last Half- Yearly General Meeting Held on 23.10.2012.

Secretary stated that the minutes of the last Half-Yearly General Meeting held on 23.10.2012 was duly circulated. Members were requested to deliberate on any point to be included or omitted. Nobody raised any further point and the minutes of the last Half- Yearly General Meeting were confirmed unanimously which was proposed by Shri Dilip Kumar Mukhopadhyay (A-3 / 7) and seconded by Shri Goutam Basu Thakur
(A-1 / 2).


-02-
Agenda No: 02
Consideration of the Secretary’s Report

Secretary at the outset welcomed all members present and read out the names of other new members who have joined the Society after 01.04.2012 viz Mrs.Kalyani Dutta (A- 10 / 6) joint member alongwith her husband Dr.Ranjit Kanti Dutta, Mrs. Sabitri Chakraborty ( A- 8 / 4) joint member alongwith her son Shri Debasis Chakraborty, Mrs.Sipra Verma ( A- 11 / 11) Joint member alongwith her daughter and Dr.Subrata Kumar Sen in respect of flat No: A- 6 / 11 in place of Dr.Sitesh Dasgupta.
 
Secretary wanted to know whether the Annual Report of the Secretary circulated earlier might be presumed to be treated as read. Mr.B.K.Ghosh (A-11 / 9) requested to read out the report. Secretary read out the same and then placed the report to the General Body for discussion.

Shri Hirak Ghosh (A- 5 / 15) stated that almost Rs. 8.50 lakhs has been spent for Building repair works. Chipping, scaffolding & repairing of the 11 buildings were done and the maximum expenditure should not have been more than Rs.3,50,000.00 as per CPWD Schedule of Rates. He asked whether analysis of cost was done before starting the work. He also asked how many mandays were spent.

Shri Kushal Roy (A- 7 / 6) stated that cost should  be justified on the basis of previous estimate / expenditure.

Shri P.B.Sinha ( A- 9 / 14) stated that the supervision of the work was not properly done. He asked analysis from the Board.

Shri Sadiquzzaman ( A- 8 / 14) asked,  as per Rule 63 of Bye- Laws of the Society, whether for carrying out the repair work any tender notice was published in newspapers and if not it should be recorded.

Shri B.K.Ghosh ( A- 11 / 9) stated that for 5 buildings expenditure incurred towards labour charges was Rs.2,25,000.00 for contractual works while Rs.3,70,657.00 was incurred for other 6 buildings and may be for other works which is not justified. He also mentioned about the lack of supervision of the works except by the Chairman & the Secretary. No other Director was ever seen supervising the job of repairing work.
-03-
Chairman stated that the repair work was done not only for 11 residential blocks with their overhead tanks but also for office building, Community Hall, Pump Room, Boot House Park, Boundary Wall, Security Room, surface drains etc as required. He also stated that the Section 63 of the Bye-Laws does not apply in this case.

Secretary stated that modalities of execution of repair works as well as painting works were explained in details in the Agenda Notes dated 31.08.2010 circulated to all the Members prior to Special General Meeting (SGM)) held on 3rd October, 2010 vide Annexures B & C which were ratified in the said SGM with necessary Resolution adopted by the General Body of our Society.

These issues were further discussed in details in the Agenda Notes dated 30.09.2011 for the Half-Yearly General Meeting held on 23.10.2011 and in the minutes of the said meeting circulated to all the Members. Necessary Resolution approving the expenditure of Rs. 8,50,000.00 was also duly approved by the General Body of our Society.

He further stated that for supervision of Repair works, one Supervisor was engaged. Besides, for each Block, one member was requested to volunteer his services. While the job was nearing completion, it was repeatedly requested through Society Notice Boards urging the members to point out any unattended places which were also duly rectified.

Secretary stated that pattern of the buildings are such that it involves much more labour component of the cost compared to the material cost as will be evident from the Details of Expenditure Statement furnished to the Members.

The measurement of the repair works were not possible to be taken due to inaccessibility as well as due to configuration of the damaged places. Naturally the practices which were adopted by our Society on the previous occasions and also in our neighbouring Society were followed. He stated that though the cost of scaffolding works are more or less assessable, but the cost of actual repair works are virtually impossible to assess in advance and it was also never done in our society before. However, all records for deployment of labour and materials are available in the office which are open for inspection by the members. He also mentioned that more recently in 2009-10 prior to taking over of the present Board more than Rs.90,000.00
-04-

was spent for the Repair Works and hardly any perceptible progress could be made in any one of the buildings. This work was then abandoned.

Shri B.K.Ghosh stated that it is debatable to which Secretary mentioned that all records in this connection are available in the office. Secretary further stated that the expenditure incurred for external repair works carried out by us in 2003-04 was Rs.3,30,000.00(Approx.) for 11 buildings only without roof overhead tanks and also excluding any common area against the scheduled estimate of Rs.2,67,670.00 only. The expenditure figure was reported in the Agenda Note of special General Meeting held on 03.10.2010 vide Annexure-B. The escalation which has occurred during these years does not need any mention.

Chairman stated that realizing the complexity of the job and huge time being taken for repairs, in order to reduce the execution time, in addition to departmental labours working on daily wages basis who commenced their work on 13.03.2011, labour contractors were further engaged on 15.04.2011 through a tender process followed by negotiation by Tender Sub-Committee for the repair works of buildings 8,9,10 & 11 and subsequently building no. 7 on 03.09.2011 (total value Rs.2,25,000.00), materials being supplied by the Society free of cost in both the cases. Even then the completion time took more than 7 months. All these facts were duly brought to the notice of the General Body and were approved.

Dr.A.K.Paul (A-9/16) said that for bypassing the tender process, work was splitted in this way which was vehemently denied by the Chairman and the Secretary and stated that all the facts and circumstances easily prove it.

Shri Swarup Ghosh (A- 7 / 1) said that the supervision of repair works was not done properly and he could not contact Secretary on a few occasions for registering his complaints.

Chairman said that a complaint Register has been kept at the main gate which should be utilized. The said Register is regularly reviewed.

Smt. Sanghamitra Roy (A- 10 / 15) said that some repair work at the ground floor of the building no. 10 below office Notice Board is still remaining.


-05-
Secretary stated that he had personally inspected the spot and there is some salinity problem which will be looked into. There is no repair problem as such there.

Shri B.K.Ghosh (A-11/9) again said that there was no supervision for the repair works and the Board allowed the money to go into the drain. No body from the Board of Directors excepting Chairman & Secretary are devoting their time for the Society.

Secretary said that he strongly objects to this view.      

Shri Subhodeep Roy Chowdhury (A-11/7) said that Shri B.K.Ghosh is harping on the same point again and again unnecessarily. If we proceed in this manner we will not be able to finish the meeting.  

Shri Pratul Roychowdhury (A- 9 / 8) mentioned briefly about the genesis of starting of the repair work departmentally which was taken in the AGM. He said it was decided that one member from each block would supervise the repair works which unfortunately did not materialise. He said that it is true that there was some lack of supervision, but considering the constraints of manpower no better supervision was possible. He further said that such kind of repair works can never be carried out as per Govt. Schedule of Rates as being mentioned by some members.

Mrs.Rupa Narayan (A- 6 /13) complained about the location and low height of her Letter Box and requested to put the same at a convenient height for her easy use.

Lt Col. A.K.Roychowdhury ( A-11 / 16) said that during his tenure in the Board, the repair and painting works were carried out within the estimated cost.

Shri Kushal Roy (A- 7 / 6) enquired whether the road repairs were carried out during the tenure of this Board or prior to that and if any warranty conditions exist for repairing the damages.

Secretary stated that the road repairs were carried out prior to taking over of this Board and although 3 years warranty existed for this work, the said contractor never turned up on our request to carry out the repairs of the

-06-
damages. Ultimately, his Security Deposit of Rs.15,000.00 has been forfeited by the present Board.

Shri Kushal Roy (A- 7 / 6) wondered why ABP Pvt Ltd is not heeding to our request to clear the dues. He said that Shri Siddhartha Roychowdhury, Director of the Board might be the right person to pursue the matter.

He also said that there is a need to fix a glowsign board at a conspicuous place near the main gate.

Secretary replied that the matter is being looked into in view of the reluctance of the ABP Pvt Ltd. in the matter. 
 
After detailed deliberation, the Secretary’s Report  with Attachments I to III was unanimously accepted which was proposed by Sri P.K.Ghosh (A-11 / 10) and seconded by Sri Nani Gopal Chatterjee (A-4 / 5).

Agenda No: 03

Excess Expenditure in respect of Painting Works


Shri Sadiquzzman (A- 8/ 14) said that as per Section 29 of the W.B.Co-operative Societies Act, 2006, such item can not be discussed in the Annual General Meeting.

Secretary stated that as per Rule 136 of W.B.Co-operative Service Rules 2011, such discussion can always be made in the AGM.

Shri B.K.Ghosh ( A- 11 / 9) asked whether tender notices for the painting works were published in the daily news papers in view of the value of the work being more than five lakh rupees.

Shri Kushal Roy (A-7/6) also echoed the same view.

Secretary stated that the matter was discussed in details and all modalities of tendering process, quality of paints etc. were finalized and approved in the SGM held on 03.10.2010 and also in the Half-Yearly General Meeting on 23.10.2011 by the General Body.

He stated that Painting Works were taken up after initially obtaining quotations directly from five leading Paint Manufacturers like Berger Paints,
-07-
Snowcem Paints, ICI (Akzonobel), Asian Paints & Shalimar Paints and then as per decision taken by the General Body, 3 paint companies offering 7 (seven) years warranty on the exterior surfaces of Building blocks were shortlisted. These Paint Companies were Berger Paints, ICI (Akzonobel) & Asian Paints.

Extensive Negotiations were held with these three companies by the Technical & Tender Sub-Committee of our Society and based on the recommendation of the Sub-Committee, Board finally accepted the offer of Asian Paints Limited.

As per Agreement the painting work is being done under the periodic supervision of Asian Paints apart from our own supervision and the Asian Paints will offer a seven year Performance Warranty on Apex Ultima which is being used on exterior surfaces of all Residential Buildings including office Building and the Security shed.

For economy in the painting works, a judicious combination of the painting types have been selected for interior surfaces and some not very important exterior surfaces.

Chairman said that as per Sec 28 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act 2006, final and ultimate authority of a Co-operative Society vests in the general body of its members assembled in a general meeting.

Even then, Sec 63 of the Bye Laws of our Society also mentions that publishing in newspapers for awarding of the contracts is not mandatory if it is permitted by the general body of members. Moreover, Section 63 of the Bye-Laws does not include the repair & painting work.

In the instant case, considering our previous experience of the quality of painting works, selective tenders were invited as per decision taken in the General Meeting from the three shortlisted leading Paint Companies of the country and with the assistance of our Technical & Tender Sub-Committee tenders were evaluated and finally approved by the Board. This has ensured quality of the work and there should not be any cause of concern now for alleged irregularity in the matter. This also saved a considerable cost on newspaper advertisements which was unnecessary in the present case.

Secretary also stated that where comparison has been possible with nearly 
-08-
identical items available in the PWD (WB) Schedule of Rates (2010) which covers almost 82% of our total estimated cost, it has been found that our accepted rates are much more cheaper and overall painting costs are definitely quite less in our case. Govt. and many Housing Societies have also been following this tender procedure.

Shri B.K.Ghosh ( A-11/9) said that had we gone for open tender we could have availed the part of the Dealer’s discount.

Secretary said that it is not all true and the Companies themselves for the sake of competition amongst themselves and getting the job had passed on the maximum possible price benefits to us which would be evident from their price bids. Moreover, it has ensured the genuinity of paints being used for the work, warranty certificate for the job etc. The rates at which the contract has been accepted can be easily compared with the PWD Schedule of Rates and it will be amply clear. 

Mrs.Nargis Sattar Hossain ( A- 8 / 6) said that in some places painting was not done properly.

Secretary replied that he is aware of this fact and the site has already been inspected by the Technical Expert of Asian Paints on a no of occasions and it has been assured that such defects will be rectified before the completion of the works.

Excess Expenditure of Rs. 50,000.00 (approx.) in respect of Painting Works was approved which was proposed by Shri Goutam Basu Thakur ( A- 1 / 2) and seconded by Shri Pratul Roychowdhury ( A- 9 / 8).


Secretary, however, added that subject to final checking of the measurement of works, the quantum of excess expenditure is likely to be less from the estimated tender value.

Agenda No: 04
Approval of Budget for the year 2012 – 13 & Programme of Activities for 2012-13

Shri B.K.Ghosh said that electricity charges has come down consequent to laying of new water supply network but maintenance charges have not decreased. He also opined that budget estimate of the Society is increasing
-09-
considerably compared to the previous Board’s tenure and the members are being asked to pay more.

Chairman said that during 2009-10 (major part of the tenure of the previous Board) an excess expenditure of Rs. 1,42,529.06 was incurred over the budgeted expenditure which was highly objected during the statutory audit of our Society. He further added that items which may be curtailed now in the Budget Estimate may be pointed out so that the estimate could be reduced.

Shri B.K.Ghosh (A- 11 / 9) said that it may be considered whether the contribution for Employees’ Welfare Fund Scheme can be increased to Rs.300.00 p.m. from the present rate of Rs.200.00 p.m. per employee with matching contribution from the Society.

Shri Arunava Maitra (A- 4 / 1) supported the Budget Estimate. 

After detailed deliberation, Annual Budget & Programme of Activities for 2012-2013 were unanimously approved which was proposed by Shri P.K.Ghosh ( A- 11 / 10) and seconded by Shri Goutam Basu Thakur

(A-   1 / 2). This was, however, subsequently slightly modified and approved by the General Body after discussion on Agenda Nos.06 & 07.


Agenda No: 06
Opening of the 2nd Gate of the Society for Limited Hours

This Item was discussed before Agenda No.05.

After detailed deliberation, the item for recruiting additional security guard was withdrawn from the agenda of discussion for the present.

Agenda No: 07
Funding for Infrastructual Development and Special Maintenance Works

This Item was also discussed before Agenda No. 05

Shri B.K.Ghosh (A- 11/ 9) said that pumps are already more than 15 years old and replacement of at least one pump is essential. He may help out in the matter.

-10-
Secretary welcomed the idea and said that Shri B.K.Ghosh was earlier inducted in the Advisory Committee of the Society but he declined. He may now help us in the procurement of the pump. Shri Ghosh, however, did not express further interest in the matter.

Shri P.K.Guha Biswas ( A- 5 / 3) , Shri Kushal Roy (A- 7 / 6), Shri Pratul Roychowdhury (A-9 / 8) and Mr.H.K.Dutta (A- 9 / 7) suggested the need for fire fighting measures in the Society.

Shri Arunava Maitra (A- 4/1) suggested the need for emergency exit for evacuation during breaking of fire.

Chairman said that all these aspects will be duly examined by the Board before coming back to the members.

After detailed deliberation, it was finally decided that so far as infrastructural development is concerned, these items will be considered in the Half-Yearly General Body Meeting. Only procurement of a new distribution pump will be made for which necessary provision will be made in the general budget. 


Agenda No: 05

Annual Maintenance Charges on the members for the year 2012-13


The Budget of the Society was slightly modified in view of the discussion on Agenda Nos. 06 & 07.

The provision on Security Charges was reduced due to postponement of opening of the 2nd Gate and Rs. 30,000.00 was added against Pump & Tubewell for the purchase of a New Pump.

After incorporating these modifications, the budget estimate for 2012-13 amounting to Rs. 13,60,050.00 was finally approved which was proposed by Shri P.K.Ghosh (A-11/10) and seconded by Shri Goutam Basu Thakur
(A-1/2).

After deliberation, Shri Goutam Basu Thakur (A-1 / 2) then proposed the Annual Maintenance Charges for the year 2012-13 placed before the house
-11-
for acceptance which was seconded by Shri Nani Gopal Chatterjee (A-4 / 5) and the Resolution adopted as following: 
“Resolved that Annual Maintenance Charge of Rs. 1,850.00 for the year 2012-13 with effect from 01.04.2012 be paid by Members either one time within 31st August, 2012 or in two instalments of Rs. 1,200.00 by 31st August ,2012 & Rs.  650.00 by 30th November 2012 and interest @ 2% per month would be payable for delayed payment”.

Agenda No. 08
Report of the Internal Audit of the Society for 2011-12 & Actions being taken

The House thanked Shri Dilip Kumar Mukhopadhyay ( A- 3/7) for carrying out the Internal Audit of the Society for the first time in the Society in a very commendable way.

Chairman assured the General Body that the compliance of the Internal Audit Observations will be made in true spirit and already actions have been started to be taken in this regard.

Chairman proposed to record appreciation to Shir Dilip Kumar Mukhopadhyay for his services as Internal Auditor of our Society which was approved by all.

Agenda No.09

Appointment of Internal Auditor for 2012-13

The House approved the appointment of Shri Dilip Kumar Mukhopadhyay (A-3/7) as Internal Auditor for 2012-13 with his consent and the following Resolution was adopted:

“Resolved that Shri Dilip Kumar Mukhopadhyay be appointed as Internal Auditor of the Society for 2012-13 which is renewable for extended terms of one year each at the consideration in the AGM. The Internal Auditor’s observations shall be placed before the General Body by the B.O.D.and before the regular External Auditor appointed for the Statutory Audit of the Society. Any contingent expenditure in this connection will be done under the supervision of the Board of Directors.” 

-12-
Agenda No. 10
Consideration of any other matter which may forwarded in accordance with Bye Laws with the approval of Chairman

Secretary proposed that due to increasing cost of papers, stationery and xeroxing charges, it is advisable to go for e-mode of communication to the members as is being done in most of the establishments now.

After discussion the proposal was accepted and it was decided that members may be requested to furnish their e-mail IDs as early as possible and after receipt of the same from most of the members, the same may be introduced in future.

The important notifications, minutes of the General Body Meetings etc. will be continued to be put up at the website of the Society www.hnchsl.blogspot.com as usual.

Secretary mentioned that two letters dated 15.03.2012 & 24.04.2012 were received from Mr.Ranjan Chatterjee (A- 8 / 16). Board had sent replies of these letters  to Mr.Chatterjee. As per request of Mr.Chatterjee, his two letters alongwith the replies of the Board have been distributed to the member at the time of commencement of this meeting for their kind perusal and comments, if any.

Chairman gave heartiest thanks to the members for their cooperation in conducting the meeting properly & the meeting ended with vote of thanks to and from the Chair.



(Biswatosh Sarkar)                                                        (Benudhar Munshi)
Secretary                                                                               Chairman
12.06.2012                                                                                                                                                                               12.06.2012




Followers